Why God’s Philosophers did not deserve to be shortlisted for the Royal Society prize

Posted on 2010/10/28 , tagged as

Share this

Just so we can’t be accused of only mentioning favourable coverage of our books on this site, here’s a length piece on the New Humanist website by Charles Freeman arguing that James Hannam’s God’s Philosophers doesn’t deserve all of it’s accolades and that it presents a distorted, Catholic-biased account of the early development of science.

It’s already causing a stir on the comments page on that site so if you’ve read the book, please get involved and say what you think, either here or on the New Humanist’s site.